1.should you be putting yourself in danger be a crime?
1. By law no but, to yourself yea sure you should try knew things but, you shouldn't be hurting yourself. you should be taking care of yourself.
2.Would the author agree?
2.I think they would because its true.
3.Find evidence from the text that would support your answer.
3."There were signs and disions to ignore them", "it's a big risk to take and one would hope fewer people will be willing to make"
4.identify the main arguments that support the authors thesis.
4."Snowmobile's must learn to respect avalanche warnings.", its a big risk and one to hope fewer people will be willing to make."
5.what warnings was the author talking about in the first paragraph?
5.avalanche warnings
6.this editorial appeared two days after an avalanche claimed the lives of eight snowmobile's lives from Sparwood, B.C how might people form Sparwood respond?
6. They might pay attention to the warnings.
7.Is there another side to the augment that is not present in the text?
7. I don't think there is.
8. How did thinking about how the author organized the editorial help you better understand the text?
8. It helps because you don't think the author is writing at random you understand that it is organized in a certain way.
No comments:
Post a Comment